70s, Boomer, History, Humor, Politics

How to Lose an Election Without Even Trying – Part 1

There was an election in Greenbelt, MD in 1977. Citizens were voting for the City Council; all incumbents. It took only 50 signatures on a petition to challenge them, and I had some free time, so I became the only fool who took on the group. I say fool now, but at the time the aura of being an elected official clouded my thinking. Fool sounded like Hero, and Election sounded like Easy. Little did I know there was more to this than gathering signatures.
The names were easy. I worked from 3:00 – Midnight at the University of Maryland. Getting up in the morning and traipsing around the town checking penmanship was not such a task. In just a few days of knocking on doors, the deed was done. My name was added to the ballot. Hero, here I come. My undergraduate degree was in Political Science. Not really surprising, huh? Now, to put it to the test. Let’s see what the books taught me.
The City of Greenbelt is a fine community. I was a fairly new resident at the time and must admit . . . . naive. There weren’t many apartment units then. Greenbelt started in 1937 as a cooperative community; part of the New Deal. My residency there was because I was a student, with a family who needed a place nearby the campus. Prior to 1974 we were living in Suitland, and I was attending Prince George’s Community College. After transferring to U of MD, the commute became a bit much. Fortunately, I was driving a Chevy Vega, which got pretty good gas mileage, even though it is considered one of the worst cars ever built. It was red, with a damaged left headlight, that was never fixed. Moving to Greenbelt made sense.
After filing the signatures with the proper authorities, I was officially a candidate. The campaign was a go, and I was determined to win a seat. Why not? I could govern. Being elected was just a matter of getting people to like me and making them aware of my desire to improve their lives. A series of mistakes (Comedy of Errors, so to speak) was in my immediate future. “I was going down,” and didn’t even know it.
The contest was not Republican vs. Democrat. Prince George’s County has always been heavily Democrat; even to this day. The Greenbelt City Council election of 1977 pitted Mishkan Torah Synagogue against Saint Hugh’s Church/School, and I was not a member of either. My daughter did attend St. Hugh’s School, because it was the nearest and least costly private school to our apartment, and like I wrote earlier, I was a student; therefore, pretty much broke. But St. Hugh’s did not require us to be members of the church.
It wasn’t a particularly bitter campaign, but sidewalk maintenance was needed in front of both buildings, and that was the underlying campaign issue (not to mention the normal hatred of competing religions). Remember earlier when I mentioned my naivete? Well, keep reading.
My wife during this period was my first. She’s the mother of my kids. Within this post, I will mention wife, and she’s who I mean. Nothing bad, but just a point of reference.
The first thing I did was take out a loan for $350 from the Greenbelt Credit Union to use in my campaign. I needed to print posters, advertise in the Greenbelt News Review, make fliers and other essential electioneering stuff. It doesn’t seem like much of a fund, but it was sufficient. Fortunately, I worked in a place with a copy machine and friends willing to help, so duplication of fliers was at the expense of the U of MD (shhh, don’t tell them). I was also writing a column for the sporadically published Consumer’s Friend, which was a free paper distributed to apartment residents in Prince George’s County. The sole purpose of the paper was to advocate for Tenants rights and the editor was an attorney who often lobbied the county on behalf of apartment dwellers.
I got my literature together and started banging on doors. One of the incumbents, Charlie Schwan, who I liked, had deposited his materials in the screen door of one of the homes I eventually approached. My intention was to be a nice guy, so when I knocked on the door and the resident answered, I handed her Charlie’s brochure, mentioning he had left it, and gave her my stuff, too. She was cordial and collected the pieces of propaganda and wished me well. The next day I received a phone call from a fairly influential lady (in her mind) chastising me for working for Charlie Schwan. Her garbled threats were something like, “You’ll never get elected by the Catholics in this town if you support Charlie Schwan.” Charlie was a member of Mishkan Torah, and apparently, I was thought to be on the side of St. Hugh’s, so she was noting my disloyalty for my permanent record.
A couple of days later I received a call from a fellow who wanted me to announce legalization of Marijuana within Greenbelt as part of my platform.  Bear in mind this was 1977. I was in favor of it but knew it would kill my campaign. The constituency diversity of Greenbelt was showing.  I had to tend to other issues.  Everything was set, now on to the actual campaign.

To be continued in How to Lose an Election Without Even Trying – Part 2 . . . .

60s, Boomer, Cynicism, Facts, History, Humor, Media, Politics, Social Commentary, Vietnam

1968 – Fifty-Five Years Ago

In 1968 I was a skinny, pimple-faced High School Senior. My biggest challenges were refraining from squeezing my zits and soiling my undies in my sleep. Worrying about economics, paying bills, who was in charge of the world, or any of those things took a back seat to fantasizing about my Business teacher, Miss Hopkins, and her Tabu perfume, and selling shoes at Bakers in Iverson Mall. But the whole country was going crazy; I just didn’t think about it.

It has been argued that 1968 was the year that changed everything. Lyndon Johnson grew frustrated with the war in Vietnam and decided not to seek reelection. He had become President upon the death of John Kennedy and then won the election by beating a lame opponent, Barry Goldwater. But now he wanted out. The country was being torn apart by opposition to a war that was none of our business. Martin Luther King and Robert Kennedy were assassinated. After the death of MLK, the cities erupted in riots. Whole city blocks were burned to the ground.  Richard Nixon was elected to his first term as President, only to resign the office amid scandal five years later. O. J. Simpson won the Heisman Trophy.

It’s easy to say today that everyone was just out of their minds back then, but unless you were there you can’t know. I was there, but oblivious, so how can anyone not subjected to it really understand? There are news accounts and historical records, but the atmosphere is not in the records. It was surreal. I remember my mother waking me by yelling upstairs to my attic apartment that Bobby Kennedy had been killed. All that went through my mind was that one day five years before, where the only thing on television was the funeral of John Kennedy. Was I going to miss Mayberry R.F.D.? Seriously though, it was shocking. How could I understand what was happening? My graduation was in just a couple of days, and that was heavy on my mind.

The Tet Offensive had just taken place in January. We watched the television reports, while my parents worried I would be drafted. I worried, too. Everyone was expected to wave a flag and declare love for America, but the young people could not figure out why we were in Southeast Asia. We were being thrown to the dogs for the sake of stopping Communist aggression. Or, so the story went. No one wanted to call it a Civil War.

But that’s all in the past. We made a mistake and lost a lot of lives as a result. I just didn’t want to be one of them. John Prine wrote a great song, “Your Flag Decal Won’t Get You into Heaven Anymore.” It was written in 1971, but I always loved the picture it painted. Honestly, I don’t really care what your feeling might be for that period of time, but while I was there, that’s how I felt. When the media was hammering Bill Clinton and George W. Bush for avoiding the draft, I sat back and held my tongue, because I understood. No one really wanted to go.

It’s easy to go to war when you can do it by proxy. Your life is safe if someone else is doing the fighting. Soldiers lose an arm, a leg, an eye, a life, a family, but it’s all OK, if it is them and not us. Politicians wave their arms high and scream “bloody murder,” but it is not them who are suffering. They don’t walk around with a limp, or an eye patch, or scooting around in a wheelchair. Yeah, they send their kids, but they send their kids. Not them. They’re safe. You can label me Liberal or whatever, but the fact of the matter is, war kills. It isn’t good for anyone. Everyone suffers.

As a society, we have to find a way to avoid war. If we are attacked, we have to react. Afghanistan made sense because that was the haven of Al-Qaeda, and they struck first. Iraq was vengeance, getting even for the past. 

If fifty years of history taught us anything, I would be surprised. We never seem to learn. When it comes to economic gains over death, we accept death as a consequence. As long as it’s not our death. Throw a soldier into the heat, and he’ll take it. But we’re running out of soldiers. In 1968 we had the draft, which meant the soldier had no choice. He had to go. Today, there is no draft, and with what is occurring at the present time, fewer men and women are opting to join. They don’t want to die any more than the politicians who have chosen their fate.

With that being said (ha ha), we need to change the future.

With Love,

Bake My Fish

P.S. Check out the videos for 1968.

Boomer, Cynicism, Facts, History, Humor, Information, Media, Middle East, Politics, Social Commentary

Shoe Fly, Don’t Bother Me

George Bush was recently involved in a game of “Duck, Duck, Goose” during a news conference held in Iraq. One of the members of the Iraqi media (a minivan, with three reporters and two digital cameras) took off his shoes (size 10) and hurled them at the President in an effort to insult him. I am not up on Shoe Insult Theory, but apparently the thinking is if you show a person the bottom of your shoe, they are forever scorned. When the shoe thrown at the person being assaulted conks them in the head, the bruise or lump might be a pretty good reminder they have just been dissed.

I was a salesman at Bakers Shoes in Iverson Mall in 1967. Our patrons were only female and so many times when I was dying fabric pumps in the back room or bringing them to the women, I saw the soles. Not once did I shake or feel insulted. Maybe it was because they were new and had not yet traveled the road of dirty sidewalks or stepped in gum or anything that might make them filthy. My guess is the soiling of the soles of worn shoes is what adds to the insult of showing them to someone. It seems the indignity can only come from a man, since the theory appears to have originated among the not-so-tolerant-of-females men of the Middle East. That’s probably why I never shivered at Bakers. When Dwight Eisenhower was President, I wonder if Buster Browns were used for the gesture, or would it have been Kinney’s or Chucks (possibly the beginning of the term “chucking” shoes)?

Perhaps that explains why some men cross their legs like a girl and some like a man. Typically, men wear pants and have no need to hide their privates. The feminish crosser is most likely just being polite, attempting to avoid showing the sole to innocent observers. It seems to me displaying the bottom of dirty bare feet would be more of a disgusting gesture, but like I said earlier, I’m not a student of the theory. Restaurants do not ban soiled shoe soles, only bare feet. So, the owners of eating establishments must not understand the Shoe Insult Theory, either.

Does the term “shooing” someone or something away have anything to do with the insult? Usually the “shooing” away of them/it is for safety purposes or because of annoyance. When someone says “shoo” are they saying “shoo” or “shoe?” If a salesman gets a “shoe in the door” is the person whose door was entered insulted? A political candidate who is a “shoo-in” could be less than flattering to the “shoo-out.” Is it “shoo-in” or “shoe-in?” And what about Shoofly Pie? The name is thought to have originated from shooing flies away while it was cooling. Is it possible it was derived from shoes being used in the baking process to knead the dough, or is there a subtle insult being extended by the pie? Only the Amish know for sure (but they’re not reading this).

I’m too fat to cross my legs like a girl, so I’ll have to continue the man cross. I never could accomplish the feminine cross, even in my early years, when thin. It was just too uncomfortable and seemed a little sissy-like to me. If someone is insulted by the sole of my shoe as a result of my inability or lack of desire to perform the girly cross, let me apologize in advance for my unintended rudeness.

Shoes should be worn, not thrown.

With Love,

Bake My Fish